hermes-ai.net

문서 보기 →
HermesHermes Agent 문서
← Back to case library
Case / 2100266182657921075자동화
Case media / 1MP4 ↗

Mnimiy

@Mnilax
Verified

Localized reading

ChatGPT를 공동 발명한 사람은 GPT Astra가 8.5에서 수행하는 작업을 0.114초 만에 수행하는 모델을 출시했습니다. 나는 Astra에서 실행 중인 빌드의 라우팅 계층에 Jev를 연결했습니다. 동일한 작업이 37분 빨리 완료되었습니다. 0m...

Original post / EN

man who co-invented ChatGPT just shipped a model that does in 0.114 sec what GPT Astra does in 8.5. i wired Jev into the routing layer of a build i was running on Astra: same task finished 37 MIN SOONER, zero malformed responses to retry. you hand it a situation and a list of typed questions. it answers all of them at once, in parallel, with a confidence number attached to each. no chain of thought, no tokens streaming out one by one. you stop parsing a JSON blob back into your code and praying it validates, because the model physically cannot answer outside the options you defined. the numbers TypeSafe publishes for it: > $0.042 per million input tokens, and output tokens are free > same accuracy as Sonnet 5 on their eval, 67.8% for both, at 294x less cost and 195x the speed > 0.114 seconds against 8.566 for GPT-5.6 Terra on the same demo > their Doom demo has it making around 10 decisions per second $40M seed led by DCVC, and the name is a nod to Jevons, the economist who showed that cheaper coal meant burning more of it, not less. this runs underneath the agent, on the calls that happen ten times a second and never get read by a person. waitlist for the API, but the browser playground is open now. links below.
views
2천
likes
37
saves
23
reposts
2
원문 보기 ↗

Quoted post

Diogo Almeida @CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x https://t.co/JSybNG2BKJ

원문 보기 ↗

출처

This independent archive preserves a public post with attribution. Text, media, account details and trademarks belong to their respective owners.